So here at WJ King, we should be the exact sort of business that they are trying to help. Ian & I took a risk (and lots of personal debt) to buy the business 2 years ago when it employed 6 people. Through lots of hard work, some great brews and, as always, a bit of luck we have doubled the size of the business, rented a new storage depot, installed 2 new (british made) fermenting vessels and we now employ 13 people.
All of this is great news, except we feel that we have done this in spite of government policy, rather than because of it. Current and proposed taxation policy is making it very difficult to continue to invest in growing our business.
We are wise enough to understand that the beer trade will always need to contribute more than its fair share of taxation for both economic and health &/or social reasons. However, we now believe that taxation has been pushed so far that it is now counter productive in both these areas.
Firstly, in terms of the economic impact, I won't rehash the much documented argument that the steep incline in beer tax is now costing so many jobs, in the pub tree in particular, that it generates less tax rather than more for the exchequer each time duty increases. The old economic theory of infinitely elastic demand for beer has been shown to have reached its limit.
There is now a very strong body of evidence showing that the decline in our pub trade in particular is costing so many jobs that the exchequer is worse off every time it increases taxes further - the pips are truly squeaking. See http://tinyurl.com/7ba7jxs for more details.
Secondly, from our perspective as a real ale producer selling into local pubs, we believe that the continuing increases in beer duty is counter productive in trying to reduce the impact of alcohol abuse on society.
I think most interested parties would agree that relatively low alcohol beer, drunk in moderation is not going to do too much damage, but there remains a very significant problem in society of alcohol abuse which must be tackled. We don't disagree.
However, if the chancellor proceeds with his plan with the duty escalator on beer - which will see beer duty rise by 42% in just 5 years - he will be increasing the cost of drinking 4% locally produced ale in the only controlled and monitored alcohol premises -i.e the local pub.
He will be driving more and more people to buy cheap drinks from supermarkets and drink them in a completely unsupervised location.
I have just completed an anlysis of our trading from January. For every £1.00 we collected from our customers, we paid straight back out in direct taxation - 46P
This covers VAT (17p), Beer Duty(17p), PAYE/NI(8p), Rates (2p) and fuel duty(2p).
46% gone before we pay the British farmers who grow our barley and hops, before we pay our growing band of employees or ourselves, before we pay our local landlord, before we pay the electric or gas company or any of the 30 other UK suppliers that we support.
As you might expect, this does not leave a whole lot to reinvest in the business. It gives very little incentive for us to expand. It does very little to raise taxes, and it does very little to improve the problem areas of alcohol abuse.
If the chancellor does implement another above inflation increase in beer duty on 21st March he won't be doing anyone any favours, least of all himself.









